Sotsionika on Lis`u

Here interesting in my view endurances from creation Lis`a, moderator of sotsionicheskogo forum "coffee house". My opinion about its theory see below.

Types

Model of the type
Descriptions of the types
Nature of the type
the "floating" type
Intraverty and Ekstraverty

Don Quixote
Don Quixote and Balzac
Hugo

Hamlet
Hamlet and Balzac
Zhukov
Maxim and the Don

Balzac
Napoleon and Balzac
Dreiser
Jack

Dostoyevsky
Gaben
Huxley

Aspects and the function

Aspects
Models of the aspects
Functions
MEMBERS and BL
the Ethics- logician
BI and CHI
BS and CHS
MEMBERS vital
the Rationality- irrationality
Sub-personalities
Verbal and nonverbal functions
External signs of the functions

1 f (cslimy mental acceptance, base)
2 f (strong mental productive)
3 f (TNS, painful function, weak mental productive)
4 f (role)
-1f (strong vital acceptance)
-2f (strong vital productive
-4 f (suggestive)

Sotsionika

Sotsionika
Sotsionika is dichotomous and is aspect
Sotsionika - this is the language
Application of sotsioniki
Signs Of reynina
Sotsionika and typing
Typing
Statistics of the types
Type Is The fox
Tests
Intertipnye relations
Relations of the opposition

Which is good and it is useful in the fox:

It noticeably simply, consecutively and intelligible explains, giving simple examples. Its reasonings contain the detailed explanations of the majority of urgent sotsionicheskikh themes and their systematic study. This is healthy! : -) As he writes, its point of view is based on the materials of the lectures Of ritchika and Filimonova, and on -soqioniceski it is correct and it is academically beautiful. If we limit ourselves to its treatments of sotsionicheskikh principles without the tying to konkretike, then its approach causes in me uvazhaniye and admiration. It knows well sotsioniku and in it there is to what to learn out of any doubts, foxes. This purpose pursues this division.

With which 4 it is not agreeable:

Search examination of materials led me to the conclusion that foxes thus far it were not dismantled to the end at the content of sotsionicheskikh aspects. That is BS, CHS and so forth consequently and the content of mental functions in it, putting it mildly, not entirely that that there is in reality. This is my opinion, at least at the moment of creating this division (30.10.02). I think, in fox the usual, close to that extended among sotsionikov understanding of the content of aspects and functions. It goes without saying, so or approximately thus were determined aspects and functions Of aushra. My opinion is different. I consider that the aspects in sotsionike are determined erroneously. It is more precise, the principles of separation into the aspects are assigned accurate, but separation itself is not brought to completion, it is not finished. In the vskom case at the given moment. I speak so entirely not of the desire to argue, but on the basis of the experience of typing and applying the sotsionicheskikh knowledge in practice. This nonconformity thus far, alas, deprives theoretical computations the fox of practical application. Too frequently, unfortunately, they disperse from the reality. About this 4 it already wrote it. This is sad. Nevertheless, as 4 already he said, by itself this material is very interesting for the study, and being connected with the correct understanding of aspects, completely let us use.