As I created this procedure

If it is honest, for was assembled nothing similar to create, 4 generally lazy for this. But about its experience to differently tell for long and inconveniently. But it is desirable to describe. Here and it was necessary to photos to gather articles to write. But can this and not procedure completely, but so - collection is indicative.... But in one I is confident - this is THAT socionics itself, which Aushra opened enormous by it thanks for this. And still me it does not please itself to convert it into the crosswords for the morons, what so wants so-called. "classical psychology" - it harvested to the button and was obtained type.

The young science of Socionics, which attempts to infuse man with an understanding of himself and to live among the community. Certainly, it is possible with its aid to attempt to become "psychologist for oneself", but I do not thus far see the real possibility of this to make to the majority of the people. It is possible to learn to foresee the dangers, which appear with the contact with the people of the specific type, to understand the strong and weak sides of its nature. But in practice very rarely is it is possible to avoid action according to one or the other weak functions. Socionics does not make it possible to far exceed the scope of traditional contact. Therefore so far Socionics - is rather a skill for those chosen few. And it will not become science until it learns to accurately determine type and develops the practical procedures of aid to people thus far soak to usual person by anything it not in the forces, since all theoretical

constructions in essence remain on the paper.Immediately I acknowledge, 4 barely learned sotsionike, at least in the manner that this is accepted now, in venerable and experimental sotsionikov at the seminars and in the schools. Itself according to the books and the articles mastered theory, and it practiced on the numerous candidates, working as manager according to the personnel in the agencies and the business concerns.

Idea about sotsioniku in ninety third year tossed up the familiar of Dumas, after saying once - "in! this is accurate for you!", and it gave to read a little the summaries of some lectures. It was more lately explained that it predetermined me as the Don Quixote, and then from half a year it hauled to its familiar. With its aid to me it was possible to understand several theoretical determinations. But then the matter did not reach the practice and year through one-and-a-half for me it was necessary to begin the study of sotsioniki again almost from zero. Especially because the work at that moment allowed great possibilities for the practice of typing. First, however it is strange, I determined the types of my several familiar completely intuitively without the tests, after reading only descriptions Of filatovoy.

As it was explained as a result of many-month observations of these people, entry was precise. And this puzzled me. But how so, it did think 4, this remarkable system, which makes it possible on the behavior to guess the nature of man, and by me it was not mastered? And 4 it began as the true Don, "to dig". It gradually gathered entire literature, which I could then find on this theme from the familiar, the libraries and the stores. Was collected entire shelf, which was proper for ninety fifth year.

Literature on sotsionike then barely they printed, and from the official publications for me it was possible to purchase only Filatovu in the house of the book in Nevskiy. This now I understand, that as the standard then by me it was accepted the types, determined according to the third level (behavior). They were checked by me in the matter, for long I controlled its first types, for several months. Everything compared, until it is convinced of each that this and really robes or Hamlet.

To me it transported and I found such, which coincided precisely with the descriptions available to me. Then 4 it began to believe in sotsioniku as into the system, which makes it possible to economize forces and to make forecasts. The tests, given in the books and the articles, first led me into the trembling with a quantity of concealed here and there ambiguous expressions and undercurrents. But their results gradually gave this wide field for the interpretation, that after only half a year I finally was strengthened in the thought, that verbal tests by no means you will leave to some.

Although its first 500 people of 4 protestiroval by the verbal tests, which it compiled from the the sotsionicheskikh and west. They worked well, but nevertheless more than half agreements did not give. After the absence of the best, with the tests I was transported about two years. For the work to me more and more greatly were necessary the guarantees of accuracy of the type. But since verbalike 4 originally wholly did not entrust, forced it was one way or another to be insured, and to thoroughly study the methods of the additional verification of tipnykh properties.

Simplest and most accessible at that moment proved to be external signs - structure of body, gestures, manner to dress and so forth at them it was necessary to stop still and because in the time to the prolonged contact and the filling tests many typed frequently not had. Now I understand, that it was not lonely in its desire to ask in the person himself, such as type it considers itself. But it was necessary to refuse in the course of time from this in order not to be confused. I was strongly astonished, after comparing once the opinion of several ten people about their tipnoy belonging - they selected in all of 4-5 versions of types. So for the first time I felt the manifestation of the so-called role model or the "social mask". It turned out that to whatever person 4 assigned a question about his type and it gave to read descriptions, majority at the first moment were approached to add themselves sensorikam and ethics. This even more greatly strengthened me in the doubts apropos of the authenticity of verbal tests.

A quantity protipirovannykh increased in the course of time. Somewhere on first thousand me it began to reach, that one type representatives are not simply similar on behavior, as descriptions say. Gabeny were not only all equally locked and impeded with the answers, but also they outwardly reminded of each other the typical by gestures, by words and by clothing. Dony- secretaries began interviews from the reasonings "what all fools!" by their sharp "man" voice and loud they cackled in response to the jokes. Robes very similarly sorrowfully kept silent, sadly looking by its "begun to cry" eyes. Generally much that is what in appearance and behavior of the typed people began to coincide toward the end of the first year of my practice. But since I was still to the end not confident in the fact that identical type people are outwardly similar, I continued to gather super for each type even it tested, whom it succeeded, on verbalike.

For the interest I selected several its familiar, about two ten candidates, arranged into the different firms, and began to systematically compare their behavior, views, tastes, habits. First I simply sank in the sea of contradictory facts. Some Hamlet could make anything - to drink, to kick up a row and to steal. Others for some reason quietly sat entire life and anywhere they did not climb. Dony in one case changed on ten places of work per year and with all they quarrelled, in other were the most obedient and executive workers in the firm, the good children, yes even only!

Although not all differed. By something elusive the representatives of some types were similar. On the interviews me periodically visited a feeling, that this person, whom I see for the first time in the life, and never it it tested, 4 already it saw. Are more precise not this its very, but here turning of head, this profile, this manner to construct phrases. But to completely realize and to isolate this similarity first 4 not could.

Finally, after this sequential vague sensation I sat down, it gathered into the heap several ten forms with the photographs and was thoroughly studied they. It turned out that this incomprehensible feeling appeared not randomly, people were actually outwardly similar. Then to me into the head for the first time arrived the thought to study external typing in earnest. There was this in the beginning of the second year of my practice as sotsionika.

From this point on, 4 already tselenapravlenno it got accustomed to the appearance of candidates, who be necessary at the interview. As they sit, as are plotted hair, as they dress, as to emotion is expressed. Through several months in me was formed the very approximate means of the Don, robe and Shtirlitsa. They most frequently came to the interviews. Gradually they began to appear already finer details. For example, I began to separate characteristic shtirlitsevskiy nose, "simian" muzzle robe or the "reckless" view of the Don. This pushed slightly to the thought about the creation of the list, which I immediately studied, and even composed the approximate description of external it was indicative.

But disappointment here me awaited. For some reason not all people completely resembled this description, and some simply persistently did not desire into it to be squeezed. Although on the tests and the behavior exactly they corresponded to their type. So it was first with the intuitive subtype Of shtirlitsa, then with the sensory subtype of the Don, and it was then converted into the steady tendency - approximately the third part protipirovannykh by the kombinirovannym verbal- behavioral method, which 4 then it used, in no way it coincided with the description of external it was indicative.

Here to me it remained nothing other how to again turn to the theory. By that time in ninety seventh I read all theoretical computations and almost it learned the descriptions of types and relations. But about this nonjoining in the external signs nowhere not there were references. Everything was limited to theory, descriptions and tests. But finally to me it transported and it was possible to purchase the book of the Kiev authors about sotsionike for the leaders. And there they casually mentioned about the fact that, allegedly, the different subtypes appear differently. There were given some brief observations about the fact that the subtypes determine the intensive functions. I.e. chain the "intensive function - subtype - external signs" was erected by itself. It remained to verify this assumption on the people.

To this there is shrewd sufficiently much time, because first for me in no way could not be selected, with strengthening of which of eight functions one or other sign, was connected. Approximately in yr, having completely tormented with the division of all types "into eight", 4, as always, it were returned to the persuasions of its black intuition and decided to simplify system to four.

However it is strange, but the matter went - two thirds of cases with the accurate results of typing accumulated by that time were packed in the diagram "four subtypes". Certainly, these were in essence Of dony, Shtirlitsy, robe and jacks, but the number of agreements inspired me. After suffering still polgodika, I understood that one function itself does not give strengthening, functions to always so say "walk by pairs". I.e. subtypes from the broken according to the number functions became those broken into the "dual" subtypes - sensory- logical, intuitive- ethical. Later I learned, that not 4 one such clever...

Moreover, i became clear the value of functions for the appearance. In the precise correspondence with the tying of functions to the "physical criteria", which I got from whose- that of summaries (point, section, sphere, etc., seems these were the lecture Of fila), the identical intensive functions gave identical external similarity. The intensive intuition was expressed as stretchability, intensive sensorika as roundness, ethics - as bright emotional manifestations, and logic as "zastylost' of feelings in the stone-". Vpechatlennyy by such results 4 still godik was trained, gathering the not being sufficient rare types (Dumases, It dost and other), but in ninety ninth it arrived at the thought about the fixation of entire of that assembled in the printed form.

It did not be desirable to write the books, but the weight of facts already began to be shown. Therefore for the beginning in I decided to gather the album of photographs. During the year the selection of the photo of celebrities engaged already four chubby volumes and allowed me to considerably refine many details in the appearance and the behavior - form of the parts of the body, to manner to move and so forth.

This work on the collection by photo simultaneously with an increase in the ability to type on the appearance completely confirmed my old fears about the nonuniformity of the distribution of types in the society and led to the realization of the real problems, whose solution 4 I do not thus far see:

1. As a result of which is obtained this surplus in the society of intuitive, and especially logical types (of about 95%) and deficiency in the sensory, and the main thing - ethical types?
2. It is possible to make what in order although to somehow facilitate contact to logical types and support in the elementary everyday survival to intuitive?
3. What to make to contemporary leaders with this quantity of intuitive types (to 80%) on the performer posts? And how to find normal operation to intuititu?
4. How to complete the sharpest scarcity of ethical types in all regions of the life of society?

So I arrived at the need for creating site in order to share with its experience and to discuss with those others practicing these and other questions.

By the only result, which, as it seems me, can be obtained from the study of this procedure now - this to pass the described by me way not in 4 years, but after half a year - yr. With the intensive practice this will make it possible to learn to distinguish types in appearance and behavior. Photo catalogs can in this soak. But rest can be studied according to the descriptions and the articles, which there are now many in the Internet. They very frequently repeat each other. To comment on them me it does not thus far be desirable, but the majority of the descriptions of types and relations work well when man can confidently determine type not according to verbalike.

4 I do not try to cite the "classicists of sotsioniki" at every turn, as this can way of life, it is accepted, since I consider that first, half of sotsionicheskoy theory it is difficult to explain to unenlightened person, but in the second place, it is convinced that its large part can be replaced with the practical exercises, whose result for the understanding of the bases of sotsioniki practicing in the plan will be the same, if not better than the study of theory. It seems to me that popraktikovavshis' in visual typing with the aid of the correctly selected standards, the novice will obtain more precise idea about the types, about the relations, and about sotsionike as a whole how after reading all sotsionicheskiye transactions in the absence of practice.

Therefore I try to proceed from the simple and obvious things. But at the basis of my reasonings the same sotsionicheskiye postulates, advanced in their time Of aushroy - aspects, function, types and so forth in sotsionike now there is no procedure of precision determination of the type of personality. Therefore thus far it theoretical. Me greatly it was desirable although to somehow fill this gap, after proposing its experience and operating times. Publishing the photo catalogs of types, I pursued the purpose to bring to the logical completion the postulate Of aushry about awarding to types of pseudonyms. If already to some historical characters it did transport and they did immortalize themselves in the history, then it is correct to deprive this of others? Photo catalogs thus came out.

If it is serious, then one of the purposes of their creation, besides the accomplishment of historical justice, consists of the demonstration on the concrete examples, as the type of personality (and subtype) in appearance and behavior of man is manifested. Photos I try to select so that the type "would be read well" - with the attentive comparison it was possible to distinguish bright external signs.

Subtypes present main difficulty in external typing at the given moment for me. As yet final clarity in questions of subtypes i do not have, but there are several precise tyings.

In the photo catalog I used photo of celebrities for two reasons: their image to more simply find and they more qualitative and are more graphic. A quantity protipirovannykh now moved far beyond 4000 people. Pravda scientific in the customary understanding this statistics you will not name - all these people were by me determined by rule of thumb and only partially (about 500) according to the verbal tests.

About the exercises on typing in the metro and on the street, I think, it is early to speak. Although, I is confident, that the type can be determined by any method, the main thing so that the method would rest on the forward reactions of man, him so to say our own "imprints", but not to the statistics of answers passed through any filter "yes-no".

I selected external signs not because they more greatly please themselves me, entirely no. Simply this works thus far best anything, this more simply to learn, and most important, in the situation, "approximating combat", when time and there is no possibility to have a talk with the man almost, this procedure gives the possibility to obtain although some information about the tipnoy belonging. While usual verbal tests occur powerless. 4 not supporters of complex multilevel "scientific" categories, since I consider that all phenomena in the life can be sufficient simply explained, if we know their essence.

Successes to you!

Bottom of Form

Bottom of Form