Hamlet

I relate very well to the Hamlet. In particular, for the same reason. Usually it is not boring with the Hamlet, Hamlet can be quick tempered, but it is also rapid, as it is angered, so rapidly it cools, and it does not consider that its partner must first change something in himself in order to restore its relations with it. Hamlet there is sometimes very much, but Hamlet, in principle, painlessly reacts if you to some period from it you distance yourself. Yes even generally, Hamlet - very frequently occurs by the soul of company, there where Hamlet - will be not boring, already this fact. If I know that on the party there will be Hamlet - that I know that it will be there gay. Hamlet, can, and he knows how to jeer (this knows how any type, so that here it is separated in no way), but it hardly this will make simply so, for fana.

"Hamlet, who reads the reference book of doctor, and all located in itself symptoms on the turn"

There was in the form, apparently, that IF it is count, generally sufficiently highly improbably so that Hamlet GENERALLY would begin to read the reference book of doctor, that he there did forget?

"to me this even is not understandable. If two it is good, then coma from this it can be badly? "

Here you entirely correctly did not understand ALE. It had in the form, it is obvious, that for Hamlet sex and the accordion - is some connected things, not divided from each other. What such is inharmonious sex? If sex is non-harmonious - the this something incomprehensible! It is understandable that the sex and accordion are not at all connected in no way for other types, and some cannot even understand that this is such accordion. Other types can not know as this accordion itself attain and survive in regard to this (entirely as Balzacs they survive apropos of its relations and impossibility to somehow change them)

If Hamlet - serious, concentrated on the global issues person, then who then Balzac? Even about Balzac 4 squeaking as teeth this description would be accepted - in it black ethics is such, what different it and be cannot - but about Hamlet? In which black ethics - in the 1- C? Which can when desired become the soul of company and make laugh any? A feeling of humor of which one of the good in sotsione, which, if it does want, can one and the same phrase say so that all zasmeyutsya? (truth the same phrase it can say and so that all will begin to cry, if does want this) which it can by its smile and mood increase to the skies, and to lower so that little will not seem?

"A it can be foxes, giving this example, it had in the form Hamlet, who does not love in reality, but it attempts to depict love as emotions.?"

He did not entirely understand that there was in the form. For Hamlet natural to express feelings by emotions, but not by feelings. 4 it did not know how to overpower all considerations of the differences between feelings and emotions, but it is obvious that feeling - this that which is felt. Emotions - this that which is evident, this as if of manifestation of feelings. Black ethics express their feelings in the form of emotions, they turn up seemingly any their feelings into these emotions and in their this form already manifest. However, white ethics know how these feelings to express directly, transporting to their that, on whom these feelings are directed directly, without their turning up into any emotions. Well, for example, to Hamlet it is sufficiently complicated to present, how it is possible to express feelings, without using emotion generally. Ethics this is natural for the white. Any blacks of logic attempt to obtain the precisely directly white ethics, without the black ethics, which to them on the contrary, interfere withs.

Yes, here still it came to mind, I fear, seemingly here was not created impressions, what only white ethics were capable of loving - this is absolutely erroneous! A question only in how each type it will express its feeling. Already if we then say, then the strongest feelings exactly can be in those, in whom white ethics in the vital ring, because these feelings seemingly burn man from within, their manifestations are unguided, in contrast to those types, whose white ethics is located in the mental ring.

For example, the same Napoleon can sufficiently easily, after being scolded, some time not to be reconciled, potomuch that it will solve, which so is better for the relations, let the partner feel, to these how much valuable relations themselves. But, let us say, the same Hamlet will try relation not to destroy, them to value and to try not to make with them anything bad. Hamlet can it is angered, Hamlet can isptyvat' the most terrible emotions, but they so will remain emotions, and it is extremely highly improbable so that Hamlet thus simply would take and would break his relations with someone to the period in order to look, which will leave this. It is more precise, with the fact, whom it values, naturally. Hamlet will be more sensitive to feelings of partner, trying not to manifest the negative of a feeling (not emotions! ) and trying not to make anything such, which can injure to these feelings.

Even when Hamlet in anger - speech about the relations or feelings as and does not go at all. Strictly, here as occurs incomprehension between Hamlet and Balzac: when Hamlet in anger Balzac it is small, which obtains on its to ek, and simultaneously still it begins to tear to pieces itself, that it can make anything with its relations. But Hamlet would astonish, and with what here relation? Well it were angered (or it they did anger), but relation- that here with what? 

How 4 already he did speak, to attempt to give descriptions of the type - matter thankless, but nevertheless, why no? Usually Hamlet feels himself raskovanno in any company. Thought about how it will know how to enter into some company, where friend invited it, and in which he not to the time thus far not was, most likely even will not arrive to Hamlet into the head, this for it something completely natural, and it will be sincerely astonished, as it is possible to generally worry about this. Hamlet can associate with thousands of people, in typical Hamlet in the familiar there can be half of city, another half will already accurately be one of familiar familiar.

Hamlet can seem very lungs in the contact by type. If Hamlet is the woman, then her type will be faster vseo manifested in any flirtation, wantonness, openness in the contact, who by many can be completely erroneously interpreted. To lyuit' Hamlet - suffering for the jealous type. T.k. Hamlet simply physically does not understand, why, once he loves, he cannot continue to flirt or to obtain the signs of attention from those surrounding. For Hamlet contact - this is his element. In the contact he feels itself as fish in the water, precisely, therefore very many Hamlet it is possible to meet, where there is much people, where the noisy music, merry people, stormy situation.

One of the most amusing features of Hamlet is manifested when Hamlet is ill. Hamlet simply does not be ill, with it occurs something terrible, even if this is simple head cold. Naturally, about the fact that Hamlet is sick they immediately learn all its familiar. With everything in this case, Hamlet does not usually entrust to traditional medicine, to the latter after being treated by some completely wild people methods (one by me familiar Hamlet, with the current cold, because of which it it sat through house, without putting out to the street nose during the week, it were treated from a cold by dressing noses with the mustard, by banks, such as malodorous infusion, in this case so I could not to me explain how it so they do not please themselves are more usually preparations) Hamlet never it will sit down next to the oktrytoy window, whereas if the matter in winter, in Hamlet himself house there can be heat, but window it, in addition, it will not open, since he knows that it can be caught cold.

Naturally, when Hamlet is ill, this very and very sad spectacle (here was recalled one additional amusing moment: if who remembers the history of Jerome k. Jerome, about the man, who began to read medical reference book and began in itself to reveal all illnesses contract - the here this is typical history about Hamlet. Strictly, precisely, therefore the Hamlet fear medicine, and to persuade them to descend, at long last, to the doctor, can only by one method: to drive away there on the fast) when Hamlet is more, all surrounding see, as to it it is bad, as to it is necessary support and contact, contact and again contact.

Generally the Hamlet very easily manifest completely any emotions: laughter, cheerfulness, just as evilly, fury - all these emotions can be expressed by Hamlet equally easily, literally during one conversation. When Hamlet tells something, from this boldly it is possible to arrange show, since it is completely probable that the story will be in the persons, each face will have its intonation and its easily learned features, on the whole, show of one actor. In view of this, it is possible to say that the typically actor's habits are generally inherent in Hamlet, since to play for it the specific bouquet of emotions - once to spit, Hamlet easily and instinctively uses these abilities in the daily life for achievement of practically any his purposes. For this very reason to be friends with Hamlet, to especially logical type, can be sufficiently difficultly, since a typical example of the contact of any the Don Quixote with Hamlet on the telephone: Hamlet can say and tell about by something (usually some gossips). The Don to Quixote already long ago it was necessary somewhere to go, to be occupied by the matter, he already once 10 said that it is time to conclude, but in this case tube it does not hang, and it continues to listen to the effusions of its friend of Hamlet.

One more of the amusing moments - this is the contact of Hamlet with the technology. Hamlet fears technology. If in Hamlet was broken some instrument, then in contrast to Balzac's the same, it never will climb inward - suddenly, something I will do harm and will make still worse? Hamlet will immediately ring one of his numerous familiar (to the same to Balzac), and will ask him in convenient (for Hamlet convenient, is natural) time to drive up and instrument to make. To refuse in this case to Hamlet is practically impossible, especially to Balzac. And here, Balzac, materyas' and being scolded, it will go to another end of the city in order to reveal that Hamlet, for example, forgot to include his instrument in rosette.

Hamlet, usually, does not love to prepare. That that Hamlet prepares - do not love to eat its guests. This is normal situation. But upasi god to meet Hamlet, who considers that it- after all it knows how to prepare. You cannot refuse, since this strongly and greatly will offend Hamlet, that it to you neprimenno will express in such form that you will yourselves feel by scoundrel and by scoundrel and curse that moment, when they refused to eat.

Hamlet it is easy and it is free the beret of money into the debt, in this case frequently it can simply forget to return them in time, or it will easily ask the installment of debt. Hamlet- woman will natural receive situation that the man pays for it in the restaurant, in this case sincerely being puzzled, that in this of such, and why this can be problem or to something force for someone. Accurately also Hamlet considers it natural so that to him would give the gifts (truth better not to give to Hamlet perfumes, well at the worst, if they in the beautiful jar. The process of the selection of perfumes for Hamlet can be extremely difficult and delicate. Try to ask in Hamlet, why she selected these or other perfumes and to begin in regard to this discussion - better than the method to finish a good evening by quarrel and you will not devise)

To Hamlet, especially to woman, very importantly as it appears and as it are evaluated those surrounding. In this case precisely this moment: the estimation of its appearance surrounding for it it is especially important. To Hamlet little it is simple to purchase to itself anything super-fashionable and beautiful, to it it is necessary that this all they would note, they praised, made a compliment. The best method to force the woman of Hamlet to feel itself badly - this to make a form, that you do not note that she is dressed in something new, or to forget to make a compliment in regard to this. In this case you can be calm, you will feel on yourselves that it means, when Hamlet is detuned by something. But exactly also, by the compliment of appearance the woman of Hamlet it is very easy to purchase.

In this case it is not importantly simple to praise, as healthily something on it sits, namely to isolate it from the crowd, to show, how to more beautiful those surrounding, to compare with someone, to show that no one can be compared with its detail. Specifically, the isolation of Hamlet from the surrounding peace, in this case is not simple isolation, but isolation precisely according to this sign - best method to arrange Hamlet to itself. Flattery, with that flattery entirely not necessarily thin (as for many other types) will be with the appreciation perceived by Hamlet.

If we Hamlet ugorazdilo are borne with good analytical abilities and pouchastvovat' in any Olympiad in mathematics for the 4th class - you be calm, you neprimenno about this learn. The same Balzac either Don Quixote can glue round with hundreds of their patents of the wall of their sorting, or they in it will be dragged along in any folder on the dusty shelf. But only not Hamlet. It is completely possible that all its sometimes obtained diplomas on mathematics, etc. honorable certificates will viset' on the wall in the frames, so that each, entering into the house of Hamlet it will see, what Hamlet is clever, and that in Hamlet are proofs, but not simply naked words. In this case, most likely, to you again and they will again inadvertent, how casually, about this resemble, suddenly you did forget? Hamlet can be careerist, in any event, to be chief, to be separated, to Hamlet very pleasantly (about the fact that Hamlet - chief, it also to you compulsory it will be resemble) Hamlet easily can bear the fact that the work is not very interesting (from what any the Don Quixote simply it will run out), if you made it a chief, you on top of that pay not bad money.

Well, and about the relations of Hamlet with Balzac, especially something to say. Generally relation - piece on so many complex, which does not yield to the simple estimations: you Hamlet, 4 Balzacs, together on with you will be well, or vice versa, together to us not to be. In the relations the people search for different, and they desire from the partner of different, and it here already sufficiently little means type, although, certainly, underwater stones with Balzac will be loading. What only stands the fact that Balzac simply does not note that there Hamlet it is dressed on his woman. Anecdote with the beard about the woman, who in order to draw the attention of husband and that will dress, even this, and this hair-do it will make, and syakuyu, in Eaton it put on gas mask, and to it at least henna, and to a question, "really you nothing note?", was obtained answer "eyebrow it did pull out, that-?" - this is history from the life of Hamlet and Balzac.

But, naturally, when desired, Hamlet will learn Balzac to focus attention on its appearance. Balzac will learn several phrases and it will repeat them, knowing that they to Hamlet are pleasant. From other side, it is worthwhile for Hamlet to show his nature, and man this Bal'zako will sooner or later simply reach. It can even it will not leave, but it will be simple sit at its table, or stay to pozdna on the work (precisely on work, and not in mistress! ), provided to avoid these stormy emotions. Well and so forth however, it does not be worthwhile to this to relate seriously. Naturally, when desired, the same Hamlet easily can tune under Balzac, and not to overload by his its emotions, using for this its friends and associates from the work. Balzac can memorize the same, that when he goes with the wife into the theater, it is necessary to make a compliment to her exterior view.

You understand, for Balzac all these emotional flashes, and especially knowledge, what it upset someone - very and very difficult experiences. Indeed Balzac, such as with unknown for it action (indeed like nothing did make? but in what then problem? ), after upsetting or after angering Hamlet, and after obtaining its portion of anger, it will completely sincerely suffer. It will oshchushchat' its fault, survive this fault, and the it is further, that more and the greater finding itself guilty and generally, by bastard. In this case it will completely not know that to it to make, since to attempt to zagovarit' with Hamlet is terrible (why it is terrible - incomprehensibly, usual explanation, that Hamlet, it is said, is angered and better to wait, until it a little poutikhnet), but it is necessary to await, thus far or Hamlet itself it will not address (but Hamlet it can this not make how conveniently for long), but all this time Balzac will experience the present torments, which it will attempt to muffle by work to pozdnain order to be distracted.

Certainly, a little poprivyknuv, Balzac will learn to step over itself through himself and to go to the world, but all the same, even after many years, this will be to it extremely and extremely complicatedly, such situations will very for long leave in it heavy sediment on the soul, and the sensation of explicit incomprehension (especially, when Hamlet, while Balzac experiences such internal sufferings, he appears, as if to it everything not on what. And it is completely possible that the day through 2-3, when Balzac nevertheless is collected courage to have a talk with Hamlet about that which occurred, it will hear as the answer: "and 4 already has long ago and it forgotten about this") method one - to try not to lead relation to the explosion, not to anger Hamlet on naprasnu

Usually it is not boring with the Hamlet, Hamlet can be quick tempered, but it is also rapid, as it is angered, so rapidly it cools, and it does not consider that its partner must first change something in himself in order to restore its relations with it. Hamlet there is sometimes very much, but Hamlet, in principle, painlessly reacts if you to some period from it you distance yourself. Yes even generally, Hamlet - very frequently occurs by the soul of company, there where Hamlet - will be not boring, already this fact. If I know that on the party there will be Hamlet - that I know that it will be there gay. Hamlet, can, and he knows how to jeer (this knows how any type, so that here it is separated in no way), but it hardly this will make simply so, for fana.

To Hamlet it is important so that it, Hamlet would please itself. But he understands this, if are obtained the quite chernosensornoye isolation, concern on black sensorike and feeling of its own significance and value for its partner. But with emotsioyami Hamlet already somehow itself will be dismantled and will create such, such as he will want. Another matter, if someone of Balzac's type is encountered, who to this emotional fascination of Hamlet does not yield, but only it comes into the stress. Then Hamlet of it can consider block and as the some faded type (each type it gives estimations by lyudyami according to its 1st and 2-1 function, the especially 1st), which still and it is irritated constantly (4 it here earlier already described approximately, as this can occur between Hamlet and Balzac time 2)

Hamlet smiles not a bit not worse and it is not a bit not thinner than Esenin. Esenin from Hamlet differs himself in terms of somewhat other - let us say, if entire life this is theater for Hamlet, then for Esenin theater - this faster hobby it more greatly is submerged in some suspended accordion with the universe, at least in me with the view on Esenin such associations appear. Yes even then, troika. To the shabby cats, worms, unpleasant smells, terrible diseases (for Hamlet all illnesses - terrible. It is more precise, so - Hamlet this is such type, which very probably, talentedly will contrive to fall ill with anything such, which is completely incomprehensible, where it took and as so it came out), and other nonsense - to Esenin to spit. It not will be for this distracted from the accordion with the universe. Already if which this accordion can destroy - that, let us say, the need for work, soblyudat' rule and instruction, or what good - anything to overhaul. Here this here - yes, problem.

But in order polyclinic "to obpolzat'" - and that he in this polyclinic generally did forget? Besides hospital (in order to the work not to walk)? But everything else auto will resolve.

For Hamlet natural to express feelings by emotions, but not by feelings. 4 it did not know how to overpower all considerations of the differences between feelings and emotions, but it is obvious that feeling - this that which is felt. Emotions - this that which is evident, this as if of manifestation of feelings. Black ethics express their feelings in the form of emotions, they turn up seemingly any their feelings into these emotions and in their this form already manifest. However, white ethics know how these feelings to express directly, transporting to their that, on whom these feelings are directed directly, without their turning up into any emotions. Well, for example, to Hamlet it is sufficiently complicated to present, how it is possible to express feelings, without using emotion generally. Ethics this is natural for the white. Any blacks of logic attempt to obtain the precisely directly white ethics, without the black ethics, which to them on the contrary, interfere withs.

Yes, here still it came to mind, I fear, seemingly here was not created impressions, what only white ethics were capable of loving - this is absolutely erroneous! A question only in how each type it will express its feeling. Already if we then say, then the strongest feelings exactly can be in those, in whom white ethics in the vital ring, because these feelings seemingly burn man from within, their manifestations are unguided, in contrast to those types, whose white ethics is located in the mental ring. For example, the same Napoleon can sufficiently easily, after being scolded, some time not to be reconciled, potomuch that it will solve, which so is better for the relations, let the partner feel, to these how much valuable relations themselves. But, let us say, the same Hamlet will try relation not to destroy, them to value and to try not to make with them anything bad.

Hamlet can it is angered, Hamlet can isptyvat' the most terrible emotions, but they so will remain emotions, and it is extremely highly improbable so that Hamlet thus simply would take and would break his relations with someone to the period in order to look, which will leave this. It is more precise, with the fact, whom it values, naturally. Hamlet will be more sensitive to feelings of partner, trying not to manifest the negative of a feeling (not emotions! ) and trying not to make anything such, which can injure to these feelings. Even when Hamlet in anger - speech about the relations or feelings as and does not go at all. Strictly, here as occurs incomprehension between Hamlet and Balzac: when Hamlet in anger Balzac it is small, which obtains on its to ek, and simultaneously still it begins to tear to pieces itself, that it can make anything with its relations. But Hamlet would astonish, and with what here relation? Well it were angered (or it they did anger), but relation- that here with what?

Hamlet never will sit down next to the oktrytoy window, whereas if the matter in winter, in Hamlet himself house there can be heat, but window it, in addition, it will not open, since he knows that it can be caught cold. This in order to with this unhealthy sense of smell and with the closed windows?!"

I attempted to emphasize by this, as strongly Hamlet focuses attention on the absence of unpleasant sensory sensations. Actually, by certain to the Hamlet, especially that, who constantly thinks about his health, it will characteristic not open window. However, there are and others the Hamlet, by which it is important to have fresh air, then will be all vice versa they be in the fact that these are the completely inflexible templates of behavior, i.e., let us say, Hamlet, it can always want the windows to be closed, since it can be caught cold. Or Hamlet can require that the windows would be always opened, since to it fresh air does not be sufficient. For example, any another type can note that the window is opened, when he has angina, or on the contrary, that it is closed, when to it about this someone says. Hamlet - not this type.

"yes 4 better pneumonia I will obtain, but to breathe draw- than not to camp. And, by the way, during typing you and I mentioned fresh air, when discussion centered on the comfort."

Here 4 I speak, unfortunately, it cannot be anything spoken about priorities which will be more importantly: not to obtain head cold or to sit in the room with fresh air. So appear individual differences. However, reaction to the unwillingness in this question to agree with Hamlet, in the Hamlet identical.

"about the diseases: When Hamlet is more, all surrounding see, as to it it is bad, as to it is necessary support and contact, contact and again contact. Also nonsenses when I be ill, everything they know, yes. But to approach me not must. No contact, pliz. If in me head cold, leave me all at rest."

Well here here I do not know. From one side, in addition, is important the connection between the contact (in this case by the fact of its absence) and the physical state. Usually it is expressed in the Hamlet precisely in the fact that they are actual, they find in the very poor mood, which, naturally, of them pours out. I think, in this case, you some well brought up Hamlet, who knows after himself this property and simply warns those surrounding against his poor emotions. However, the majorities of the Hamlet about such trifles do not think.

And that, you want to say that to select technical directivity not is characteristic for Hamlet. In other words, to be occupied not by its matter, and that now, me everything to throw and to go into the theater, so that- whether? "

No, precisely, this no one to say, certainly, he does not want. Any type can be developed on any scenario, and to be occupied than it it is desirable in the life. In the descriptions a certain classical, most common copy of the type usually is given. As has already been spoken, because of different development of subfunctions in the functions or because of a difference in interfunctional interactions, representatives of one and the same type it can be the order of 50 thousand.

Again I will repeat: type, in no way determines that how man will be occupied in the life however type it determines the complex of possible reactions in one or other situation or another, and the motives of the behavior of man. Well for example, Hamlet, in the case, when in it breaks technology it can behave thus: "if anything breaks at the not suitable moment, then as a rule strongly I be nervous. I attempt to be quieted and to perceive situation objectively, but it is not always obtained." Here this here "I do be nervous" - from where it is taken? What would seem such, well was broken some instrument, which does make it necessary to be nervous? It does be worthwhile to indicate that the reaction of jack (in which MEMBERS it is located not into SuperEgo, but into Ego) it will cause generally no nerves, moreover, to it even it will be incomprehensible those, who be nervous on such trifles, and to whom it is necessary to be calmed. Visualize now the situation: Jack and Hamlet, was broken instrument, at the most inappropriate moment. It is understandable indeed, who will on what expend the energy: who to the attempts to be quieted, while who to the presence of optimum output from the prevailing situation. In this case, in the same of Hamlet, one of the possible reactions, can be: "that you make, do not climb, but the more badly it will become!", with the condition, of course, if it to this jack does not entrust.

By the way, the fact that Hamlet obtains some technical formation - nothing changes. In its region this person it is actual, is obtained confidence (which comes with the experience, certainly); however, from the base reactions to get rid to the end in it hardly will come out, those more in the regions, not connected with its experience in any manner.
It is interesting, by the way that you do make as system administrator, in the situation, when do appear something extraordinary, then that it is not entered in anything, which for you did be necessary to solve earlier, and in this case aids from the usual sources you also obtain cannot? How you do react to this situation?