Typing now

The different methods of typing at present adapt. But they differ only to the first view some methodologists they attempt to evaluate behavior and behavior of man, his statement, moral and ethical standards, the level of culture, intellect and so forth others are based on the opinion of that typed about itself, its self-appraisal. Both approaches usually do not make it possible to see completely property of the type, which therefore is frequently determined erroneously. As showed experiment SRT99, use of these methods gives the convergence of results on more than in 30% of cases.

The authors of the majority of sotsionicheskikh management and articles bring little statistics according to the results of typing and almost in no way they mention the detailed step-by-step descriptions of procedures. Usually these places descend or the authors make form, that the procedure and is so intelligible, and the fitness for work of one or other approach or another - thing by itself being understood. This approach I call theoretical or philosophical sotsionikoy. My work does not have as a goal to develop this direction separately from practical results.

Naturally, it is simplest to declare this procedure of sequential the "typology of tipologa", which does not refer to sotsionike. But the fact is that 4 anywhere it did not depart from sotsioniki, simply used it more intensively than perhaps some. And it reached more accurate results, although, it can be and not in complete agreement with the so-called. by the "scientific" principles, which imply the application of beautiful mathematical diagrams, philosophical paradigms, symbols and so forth everything which interested me, these are practical result, precise and rapid determination of the type. And 4 I do not propose to believe to me for the word, but I recommend by all by that interested to try this procedure in practice and to independently estimate the obtained results.