Three levels of the manifestations of the man

Thus, after taking as the starting point physical body, gestures and the emotion of man, I will attempt to arrange all manifestations of man in descending order of their degree of the correspondence to type. For this I propose the concept of three levels

Level 1. Body, appearance and physiology.

Body - organism of a human or animal in his external, physical forms. Physiology - totality of the vital processes, proceeding in the organism and its parts. . Appearance - external appearance of man. The explanatory dictionary of the Russian language Of ozhegova (further - TSO).

Level 2. Emotions, motion and the gestures

Emotions - sincere experiences, feeling, TSO. The subjective reactions of man and animals to the action of internal and external stimuli, the manifested in the form pleasures or the displeasures, happiness, fear and so forth (French of y.motion, from the the Lat. emoveo - I shake, I disturb) the Great Soviet Encyclopedia (further BSE) motion - change in the position of body or his parts. TSO gesture - motion by hand or another movement, anything which expresses or which accompanies speech, TSO.

Level 3. Behavior and behavior

Behavior - means of life and actions, TSO. System of the interconnected actions, achieved by a subject for the purpose of the realization of the specific function and which require his interaction with the medium, BSE. Act - perfected by someone action, TSO. The estimation of the behavior of man from the point of view of morals, law here is involved, and also all actions of man in the widest sense, adjusted by conscious and volitional effort - content of his creation, the sense of statements, the style of contact, work, opinions about by something and about itself, judgment and estimation, the style of thinking and so forth at this level the greatest force have words.

These levels and their hierarchy I introduced, being based on the experience, after arranging them with an increase of the degree of the correspondence to type, and consequently, increase in the complexity of typing - according to the gestures and the appearance to determine the type most simply, and most difficultly on behavior. External similarity- dissimilarity most precisely transfers typical features, and behavior and behavior - most washed away criterion of the type.

This three-level approach pushed me against some conclusions, to briefly formulate which is possible in the form of the rule of "three-phase progression":

1. If man is outwardly similar to the standard of the type, then he belongs to this type
2. It means, most probably, it will emotsionirovat', move, gesticulate within the framework of its type
3. Its behavior and behavior, possibly, will be close to the the tipnym

From the point of view of classical sotsionicheskogo approach, the sequence exactly is reverse - if man enters as the specific type, then he it is. This seems strange, but the incomprehension of simple fact - man is that type, to which it is outwardly similar, but not that, about which its behavior speak, it brought contemporary sotsionikov into the blind alley. In this there is a fundamental difference in my procedure of typing.

It is possible to approximately estimate the accuracy of estimation of the type according to the levels in the number of agreements with the present type:

Level 1. Body, appearance and physiology - 80-100%

Level 2. Emotions, motion and gestures - 50-100%

Level 3. Behavior and behavior - 30 -50%

6. As this works

Reality of our physical universe - very rigid thing with its strict laws. To destroy them is possible is only mentally. Systems and structures in this refined form as, for example, the mathematical formulas, such as them it sees men, in nature there does not exist. They are devised. The fact that they operate, does not speak about their universality. And the number of phenomena, which is not yielded to description with the aid of the formulas and the diagrams, confirms this of emotion, clairvoyance, mental illness - list of incomprehensible to science phenomena can be continued for long. Unfortunately, sotsionika thus far in essence uses the standard "verbal- descriptive" method, borrowed in psychologists and psychiatrists. The rare attempts to use the mathematical methods of special benefit do not bring, since the absence of the more- less working in practice theory does not make it possible to gather minimally reliable information for the mathematical analysis. The same problem and with typing. The absence of precise standard it is indicative types and functions it impedes any work on the study of the real behavior of people, forcing researchers to again and again prove that already proven within the framework of assumptions. In a word, the stage of infantile faith and youthful maximalism for sotsioniki yet did not pass.

In turn, until I used formulas of verbal tests and naive descriptions from the books of soqionikov- practitioners, in me, although it was obtained to accurately determine type, this was faster successful accidental entry, but not by rule. Assuredly "to fall" into the type I began, when, having in abundance acquired skill in verbal typing, it rejected all tests and one-piece means of the type, reflected in the external signs, the emotional and engine reactions, took as the starting point. This made it possible to see type and its manifestations not randomly, but at will and afforded the real possibility to investigate typical manifestations in the life, and not in the theory.

Alas, as so often is the case, dreams pink intuitively -soqioniceskie broke against the severe sensory reality of way of life. And many theoretical assumptions so remained assumptions. Practice showed that there is neither 100%-o1 of fitness for work of intertipnykh relations nor possibility for many types to find duala at will nor rigid prescribed nature of tipnykh properties in the behavior.

The same practice made it possible to see the surplus of logical types unadapted to the life in the jungle of contemporary society and the almost complete absence of sharply deficient sensory- ethical types. But also was placed the mass of questions, that with this with all to make, if generally it is possible something to make...

Let us return to the procedure. I consider as the main tool in the science or in any other region of the activity of emotion and sensation of the person himself, who deals with this science. Any instruments play in studies only auxiliary role, giving to man the possibility more intensively to oshchushchat' and to feel the surrounding peace. It is considered that if man cannot something see or touch itself, directly, then he will make this through some instrument. But this in no way means that without the instrument it cannot perceive this phenomenon directly or at least surmise about its essence. If this was then, then theoretical discoveries would be impossible. There is no instrument - there is no science? Fortunately, this not so all great discoveries occur in that enormous space, which rightfully originally belongs to man - space of spirit.

In sotsionike there are no as yet precision instruments, and those that there is, they do not give the guaranteed results. Habit to rest on readings of instruments stops the majority of attempts at the real studies. It can be, such instruments will appear in the course of time, then everything changes. There is for the present only a possibility to receive the surrounding peace directly, through our five sensory organs. Therefore for typing I propose to take the method of direct observation during the basis. But in order to save time, I propose the list of the criteria, found and checked by me in the practice of typings, to which I propose to focus attention first of all.

To understand this procedure is possible, if we do not use complex intellectual diagrams, but to rest on the "natural" indices - piece, the centimeters, the visible bends of surfaces and so forth in other words, I propose to observe obvious, and not to attempt always "to read between lines". And to evaluate means and sensations in the terms "it is similar - it is not similar".

I know several people, which arrived at the similar procedures themselves by approximately the same way. For example, computer working by photo. There is the so-called method Of anuashvili - use of asymmetry of the person (for sure many noted that faces of people were asymmetrical). How I know, in this method the asymmetry of the right and left side of face is compared. Unfortunately, this procedure requires auxiliary equipment, and result is connected with the type only on one criterion. There are curved smiles in irrational logicians and symmetrical in rational; the intensive tipping of the head to the different sides during the contact in intuitov and "pryamoderzhaniye" in sensorikov. This sign is not always vividly manifested, and on one symmetry of the person to make conclusion about type as a whole riskovanno. There is a method of typing on the the glazodvigetel'nym to reactions, also requiring the additional procedures of testing.

The simplest and most reliable method to learn to type on the appearance, which I know - to examine a little more people with the different types and to ponablyudat' after their behavior in the life.

To somewhat more complexly learn to determine type on the photographs and the video recordings, but this is also possible, if we are stored up by patience.

To determine type to the rumor, on the voice sufficiently difficultly, although this possibly and repeatedly for me succeeded, also is sufficiently labor-consuming.

Handwriting also can serve as criterion, but even less reliable than voice.

But here what it is not possible to make, so this to learn to type having only read the descriptions of types (and even having learned them by heart!), but without observing nekotore time the behavior of real people.

And already entirely hopeless is seemed to me the attempt to type only on "verbalike". The selection of literary works, the semantic analysis of correspondence, external tests and other similar "exercises" to the detailed intellectual analysis of this very indirectly relating to the type sign, not vidya and without associating with the real person vzhivuyu, such popular in the medium sotsionikov, by themselves do not have practical significance for finalizing of the real habits of typing, but sometimes even they interfere.