_

Authenticity of the results

How to be convinced of the fact that the results of typing accurate?

Methods two and 4 them I commonly use both:

· the main thing. The integral means, which create the external manifestations of that typed - appearance, the motions, emotions.

· auxiliary - results of the activity of that typed, statistics, facts - everything that man made and that it is possible to observe and to calculate

There is its, different from others, individual integral means in each type - the locked sequence it is indicative, infinitely repetitive itself. As its basis serves the system of vospritiya of physical peace. Under any conditions and in any state of man his type is manifested in the form of separate it is sectional this sequence, and frequently it is possible to examine and to feel its entire.

Difficulty in the fact that this sequence does not have initial point or main component, which would allow, after taking it as the starting point, to build the linear sequence of typing, so customary for the contemporary scientific approach. If we entrust to instruments or tests, as is customary in the official science, then each component of this entirety either will seem by the main thing (eye, the asymmetry of the person, the style of letter, etc.), or - secondary. In any event the attempt to find this "center of gravity" in the manifestations of the type it is doomed to the failure. After the trees usually so it is impossible to examine forests. Means of the type usually slips off from the view on it through the microscope of sequential test. Meanwhile if we during typing listen ourselves to its sensations, and then analyze them according to the specific diagram, then grasp, grope this sequence not too is complicated. Is necessary simply to be attentive the fact that you feel or survive with obshcheniii with the man, and most important, to approach to observe obvious, to note that which at the given moment find before the eyes. For this perception is necessary the specific estrangement, its kind the coldness, which gives the possibility to look to the situation from the side, it is unprejudiced, to see people and things by such, such as they exist, without contriving and without justifying them. If it is possible to receive in this state, then "to grasp" integral means of the type not complicatedly, sufficiently is attentively to observe. Well certainly, to know at least some signs, which in the combination with each other show the "piece" of this sequence, on which it is possible to identify the missing parts, and which indicates that or other means of 16. It is confident, this succeeds many actively by that practicing. Here only in otstutstvii of the matched technology for each it is necessary to begin the construction of technology to first and develop its bicycle. This occupies much time.

It is possible to compare this sequence with the structure DNA. Whatever was organism, one and the same genetic part will be repeated in each of its cells. , in my view, external visualization is the simplest method to see this sequence. In order to facilitate this process, I made a photo-gallery of types. Looking intently at the external means of man, more easily in all to learn "to catch" integral means of the type. Preliminary separation of subtypes from basic type and knowledge of the mechanism of the functioning of social masks considerably facilitate this procedure.

The results of activity make it possible to be certified in the fact that the type revealed during the first stage appears in the manner that it must manifest in accordance with the description. I.e. it is necessary to be certified, does act man in accordance with his type. This, strictly, it is not the part of "direct" typing, but, it is faster, it makes it possible to verify result. And then to make a conclusion about the practical use of knowledge about the type of this person - what to make as to construct relations with it, as it is better to it to use its abilities, etc.

The statistics, assembled in the observation of the man (as it manages one or other work or another, as are constructed relations, as it behaves in private life, etc.), it must indirectly confirm conclusion about type and be joined with the description of standard type behavior on the whole. For example, Shtirlits must all "construct", the Dumases - create conveniences, Zhukov - "war" and so forth this standard condition and man, such as it not was, sooner or later manifests its tipnoye behavior. Only not always it is possible operationally this to otsledit'; therefore this method cannot be basic.

To that there are two reasons:

A) type is erroneously determined and it is necessary to return conversely and to search for errors in typing

b) man is in the state, which lies after the framework of a "behavioral standard of the type", if we possible then say the empirical descriptions, given in the literature.

It is no secret that the type in different ways is manifested depending on the state of man. And although 4 it already mentioned the theme of the boundaries of manifestation of the type in the "correspondence", to develop it I plan only later.